We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
It is a fact that the story is told from a certain perspective, in most cases from that point of view that interests the dominant power. We must therefore assume that the history we know is not as accurate and real as it should be, since historians, over time, have not been able to remain independent in their research. There is usually always a pocket that pays and forces you to direct what happened to a specific place, which somehow favors your own interests.
The recent history of Spain is a clear example, schools hardly focus on the period of Republics and elevate to the category of great achievements the fascist period dominated by the Franco dictatorship.
If we go back in time, the fractures that are undertaken with the reality of history are usually greater. For example, if we go back in time we can speculate on the ages of certain constructions or even as it happens with human evolution, which is modified day by day thanks to new findings.
Neither so recent nor so old, the truth is that history, especially the homeland, must undergo certain periodic revisions to try to remove it from the social, economic and political influences, current and past, under which they have been written, to know giving way to a greater likelihood of what actually happened.
A revision to the 16th century: the Invincible Armada
The 16th century is remembered by historians as the Golden Age due to the flourishing that took place during this period of cultural activities, such as art and literature. In addition, it coincided with the political rise and subsequent fall of the Austrias and the Spanish Habsburgs.
It includes key historical moments such as the end of the Reconquest, Columbus's trips to the New World and culturally it includes the Renaissance and part of the Baroque.
A truly turbulent period that has been used repeatedly as longing for the height of the Spanish Empire. And it is in this century when Spain reaches its greatest political and military power in its entire history, with great and vast possessions in Europe, the Philippines and America, being the dominant nation in Europe.
It is convulsed because its many open fronts caused a continuous atmosphere of wars, both internally (commoners, Germanies ...) and abroad (constant war with France, against German Protestants, against the Turks for control of the Mediterranean, against England for support to the Dutch…).
And it is precisely in one of these confrontation problems that a historical review is needed. The confrontation between the Spanish crown and England makes waters for different points. One of them is the one that refers to the Spanish Armada, also known as the Great Armada and which is subjected to a thorough review by a history website, a great connoisseur of everything that happened with the famous Spanish Invincible Armada.
Big lies about the Invincible Armada
Thanks to this website that carries out a thorough review of everything that happened in reference to the also known as the very happy navy, we will be able to know many curiosities of the invincible army as well as knowing why it is called the Invincible Armada and who called it that way.
Could it be that this name, so spectacular and attractive from a promotional point of view, was only called by the Spaniards themselves to exalt their power at sea? Or that it was the later authorities who gave that epithet to the army that fell so loudly in front of the English, or it was not like that and there really was no such defeat?
You will have to read this great work to fully know the whole plot, the truth and lies, who were its protagonists, what role they played Felipe II and Isabel I in the defeat of the Invincible Armada. What damage did the English really inflict on the national fleet? You may be surprised by the answers that the Armadainvencible.org blog has in store for you.
The famous black legend of our Navy It is not as they told you, most likely fueled by the interests of the English themselves and, perhaps, by the national shame of being other factors, much less heroic, by which the Spanish did nothing to stop the British fables.
The mysterious character: the Duke of Medina Sidonia
¿Who was ultimately responsible for this historic defeat? So far it is the Duke of Medina Sidonia the one who carries the weight of the defeat of the Invincible Armada. Denossed, reviled and leading the list of cursed characters in Renaissance Spain, the Duke Medina Sidonia he has endured the ineffable label of inept for making the supposed decisions that ruined Spanish naval power.
But if we look at the updated information that historians offer us from the Invincible Armada website, we will begin to doubt that frankly this unusual character was responsible for the defeat and not a hero who managed to bring back three quarters of this army of ships of war and that, apparently, he alone faced eight English ships.
Alonso Perez de Guzman, which was the name of the VIII Duke of Medina, It was not only the Captain of the Ocean Sea who led the Invincible Navy to the confrontation against the English fleet, but he had been a fundamental part in the creation of the Naval Navy with which they presented themselves so proudly to the world.
He was also a tactician, frequently asked by the regency about the possibilities of invading Ireland, so it can be assumed that this man was not at all inept and was not responsible, at least in full, for the fall of the most naval fleet. great that never knew the ocean.
But as often happens, and we already said at the beginning of this article, the story is written by someone who at a given moment may be due to a cause. Y it would not be the first case in which a hero was used as a scapegoat of really incapable people, but who occupy positions of power.